The limits of imagination, the recurb of decision making process and the conditions of actual interaction or exchange. The actuality of thought, what separations could be imagined for imagining space and focus, for the differences in what is real information within my mind and what is actually imaginary, what the mind could make of any supposed fact or any instance within seconds; wonderment. Static clinging to the ether, sparking relevance. The dignity in nature, the beauty: the honor the burdens of survival, the mean and intense and hunting. Truth, goodness, asthetics, the moral groundings of perspective interpretation and personal belief, the distrust in beauty, waiting for the trap to close its mouth around such beautiful color and wonderful scent. Animals are at their very best when hunting or hunted, the focal devoid patterning of stress and the divides created in risk assessments and global alarm mechanisms. The cultural stigmas that add to the confiscation values of interest and investment, analyzing figures of worth or worthiness, the ruthless stealing sense of connection and connectivity, this taken from sense of usefulness, the wringing ‘nothing new under the sun’, the releasing imagining the day when we have actually said all there is to say. Silence as boarders to thought, to imagination, the cushion of quiet and the need to imagine that in a universe of constant sound and motion (and change, and exception), that there could be places physiologically that are actually silence. Searching thoughts for silence itself, the left alone consistencies of wonderment and its meaning, the decisions we have already made without making them, the distances between thought and imagination…
What dimension in mind
confiscated the word daylight
and who would ever
want to hear
“The transcendental imagination is without a homeland.” Heidegger.
Imaginary a space and the indicatives of timing in the concentrations of attention or the relevance of reference in accordance with the potentials of already existing data and the limits of that which must be formed anew. The impressions of data in elicitation and the realizations of possibilities in triviality and the ever constant pull of same-ness and proximities triumphing over the more accurate and real, the paradox and parable in the phenetic actuality of real connectivity. Structureless shapeliness and the changing of a limb of thought like a snowflake falling to different patterns according to the atmosphere, grew another dimension and then melted it away, prisms of light instantaneously portraying image and picture, in no particular place, storing these visions and compliments of scenery in potentials and gradients for future shapeless patterns. These quadrants of digestion to exist and take apart that which has never been seen before, that which without perspective could never be heard. These other dimensions in mind, never given a perspective, cannot be real? Or can make false reality from physiological constructs response to imagined stimulus? These other worlds within us, of silence clarity and stillness, of things that do not exist anywhere else in this universe of constant motion and sound and noise: actual silence, actual stillness, imaginings of a present moment, now a past. Still frame capturing parts of motion that we then fill in for with Fourrier transforms, imagined fluidity creating parts of dimension in motion and imagination, new shapeliness to form image and texture, to create a space in which something within could be recognized. Newness becoming the boundary limits to potential and gradient, the data itself the path itself, data the nutrients necessary to physiological constructs of risk assessments and global alarm mechanisms, the ways in which new data reforms old, and the possibilities in anything being actually new. The fragments of any other path to be found, the same letters or basic body, forming something new, forming new limits of possible creation in the future, stopping points of form to solidify change within boundaries of what has been created in the past. Similarities and paradox in structure or bodily limit, the shallows of patterns of indicatives based on these faint aspects of evolutionary structure, that one cannot help but share, compared with the comparison of the deeper aspects of phenetic collocation, especially in imaginary and mental event, which are physiological constructs.
“The psychic always has the tendency to reduce the acts of the spiritual person to (its) own limited categories” -Jean Yves LeLoup