WholePart

The ease of formulaic writing, the conditions of repetition and the concerns in cornering of possibilities in origins. The morphologic conditions of investment or indicative are ambiguous at best, the differences or similarities in timing or the differentiations in space: the conveniences of necessity or that which is proximal according to distance or consistency in difference or similarity in contrast to that which is symbiotic or that which actually grows, has balance and homeostasis in actual growth in accordance with environment and body. The distance imagined in thought or that which is supposedly beyond environment being attached to it, the suppositions in weighted distinctions of indifference and that which is obvious or the oblivion in that which is common or seems everyday: the intrinsic values of space and the wanted immanence in figures, the action and reaction do not necessitate function, the distances supposed do not exist to travel, the supposition of dimension in imaginary based on any part or wholeness of person or environment is faulty at best. The transcendental imagination is without a homeland: The exactitude [s!] of space for imaginal? Conditions of refinement in that which is melted down from outside of us in these metals between dimensions for moments of shapeliness in source-less electric stance making placement for path or convening pattern to movement in conversions of space from possible stillness, clarity and silence. The possibilities in vapor or the elements of actual thought and its pathos, the distinctions in that which is actual or imaginal, the physiological constructs of imagination and the patterns and paths created in source-less electric input from physiological sources. Imaginary is imaginary, the rhetorical situations in placement of potential, purely applied and the distinctions in persistence of any language in value or its placement in that which is beyond: possibilities of infinitum in that which is imaginary, the conditions of that which is cause or meaning or reason and the infallible suppositions of absolution in purity…applicable quantity or quality, ease in measuring the ifs or these confabulated excuses against logic: as if the variable contrivances of spaciousness in that which is ever always connected isn’t enough…silence, clarity and stillness exist. Empty space is a real possibility, silence is an answer, the actuality of connectivity and continuer isn’t really absolutely decidable, the variable allowances in data shouldn’t really be either…random? The actuality of possibility exists far outside of popular opinion and eclectic variant doesn’t automatically belong anywhere. Expectation and the diligence of wonder, the significance of thoughtlessness in creativity and that which is actually beyond, metaphysical data being a physiological construct, the idea of that which is beyond imaginary, beyond sense and beyond collective is still coming from a physiological perspective, and in this understanding I can’t trick myself as easily into believing my imagination for that which could be beyond, and can be more accurate in differentiation between that which is imaginary and that which is actual information or elsewise. Conditions for wonderment and that which is beyond, the actuality of accident and coincident, the asymmetrical beauty to nature that we can recognize, these accidents that we are and the ways in which nature works and changes, grows and moves. The possibility in accident and coincident as part of morphological movement and the necessity in a medium ‘beyond’, (clarity, silence, and stillness) does not necessitate wholeness of person-hood nor environment, nor offsets of immanence in presumed wholeness in environment, time, nor person-hood. The variability of matter and the distances between dimensions in vibratory patterns or that which is beyond timing, or presumed spaciousness: not beyond either but not in any assumption of wholeness nor perfected isolation of partiality, hopefully. Fourrier Gauss, Lorentz, movements shapeliness and the imagined fluidity to motion, impartial partiality and whole wholeness, or any other variant, that make the line drawn by Pascal seem almost fair, but my line of sight will never be anywhere below that line of water. Tricking myself into assumptions of observation is very easy, assumptions upon connectivity are even easier.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.